OUTLIER DETECTION TECHNIQUE FOR HETEROGENEOUS DATA USING TRIMMED-MEAN ROBUST ESTIMATORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2022-3-5Keywords:
outliers, robust estimates, trimmed mean, symmetric and asymmetric truncation.Abstract
Context. Fortunately, the most commonly used in parametric statistics assumptions such as such as normality, linearity, independence, are not always fulfilled in real practice. The main reason for this is the appearance of observations in data samples that differ from the bulk of the data, as a result of which the sample becomes heterogeneous. The application in such conditions of generally accepted estimation procedures, for example, the sample mean, entails the bias increasing and the effectiveness decreasing of the estimates obtained. This, in turn, raises the problem of finding possible solutions to the problem of processing data sets that include outliers, especially in small samples. The object of the study is the process of detecting and excluding anomalous objects from the heterogeneous data sets.
Objective. The goal of the work is to develop a procedure for anomaly detection in heterogeneous data sets, and the rationale for using a number of trimmed-mean robust estimators as a statistical measure of the location parameter of distorted parametric distribution models.
Method. The problems of analysis (processing) of heterogeneous data containing outliers, sharply distinguished, suspicious observations are considered. The possibilities of using robust estimation methods for processing heterogeneous data have been analyzed. A procedure for identification and extraction of outliers caused by measurement errors, hidden equipment defects, experimental conditions, etc. has been proposed. The proposed approach is based on the procedure of symmetric and asymmetric truncation of the ranked set obtained from the initial sample of measurement data, based on the methods of robust statistics. For a reasonable choice of the value of the truncation coefficient, it is proposed to use adaptive robust procedures. Observations that fell into the zone of smallest and lowest ordinal statistics are considered outliers.
Results. The proposed approach allows, in contrast to the traditional criteria for identifying outlying observations, such as the Smirnov (Grubbs) criterion, the Dixon criterion, etc., to split the analyzed set of data into a homogeneous component and identify the set of outlying observations, assuming that their share in the total set of analyzed data is unknown.
Conclusions. The article proposes the use of robust statistics methods for the formation of supposed zones containing homogeneous and outlying observations in the ranked set, built on the basis of the initial sample of the analyzed data. It is proposed to use a complex of adaptive robust procedures to establish the expected truncation levels that form the zones of outlying observations in the region of the lowest and smallest order statistics of the ranked dataset. The final level of truncation of the ranked dataset is refined on the basis of existing criteria that allow checking the boundary observations (minimum and maximum) for outliers.
References
Hampel F. R., Ronchetti E. M., Rousseeuw P. J., Stahel W. A. Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1986, 526 p. DOI: 10.1002/9781118186435.
Hoaglin D. C., Mosteller C. F., Tukey J. W. Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. New York, Wiley-Interscience, 2000, 447 p.
Staudte R. G., Sheather S. J. Robust estimation and testing. New York, Wiley, 1990, 351 p.
Huber P., Ronchetti E. M. Robust statistics. New York, Wiley, 2009, 363 p. DOI: 10.1002/9780470434697.
Cousineau D., Chartier S. Outliers detection and treatment: a review, International Journal of Psychological Research, 2010, Vol. 3(1), pp. 58–67. DOI: 10.21500/20112084.844.
Hawkins D. M. Identification of outliers. London, Chapman and Hall, 1980, 188 p. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.4710290215
Aggarwal C. Outlier analysis. New York, Springer, 2016, 488 p. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47578-3
Manoj K., Senthamarai K. Comparison of methods for detecting outliers, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 2013, Vol. 4, pp. 709–714.
Saleem S., Aslam M., Shaukat M. R. A review and empirical comparison of univariate outlier detection methods, Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 2021, Vol. 37(4), pp. 447–462.
Andrews D. F., Bickel P. J., Hampel F. R., P. J. Huber, W. H. Rogers, J. W. Tukey Robust estimates of location: survey and advances. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1972, 372 p.
Balakrishnan N. Parameters, order statistics, outliers and robustness, Revista Matematica Complutence, 2007, Vol. 20(1), pp. 7–107. DOI: 10.5209/rev_rema.2007.v20.n1.16528
Ramsey P. H., Ramsey P. P. Optimal trimming and outlier elimination, Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 2007, Vol. 6, pp. 355–360. DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1193889660
Reed III J. F., Stark D. B. Robustness estimators of locations: a classification of linear and adaptive estimators, Journal of Applied Statistics, 1994, Vol. 21(3), pp. 95– 124. DOI: 10.1080/757583650
Reed III J. F., Stark D. B. Contributions to adaptive estimators, Journal of Applied Statistics, 1998, Vol. 25(5), pp. 651–669. DOI: 10/1080/02664769822882
Hogg R. V., Lenth R. V. A review of some adaptive statistical techniques, Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 1984, Vol. 13, pp. 1551–1579. DOI: 10.1080/03610928408828779
Prescott P. Selection of trimming proportions for robust adaptive trimmed mean, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1978, No. 73(361), pp. 133–140. DOI: 10.2307/2286534
Zylstra R. R. Normality tests for small sample sizes, Quality Engineering, 1994, Vol. 7(1), pp. 45–58. DOI: 10.1080/08982119408918766
Shapiro S. S., Wilk M. B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples), Biometrika, 1965, Vol. 52(3/4), pp. 591–611. DOI: 10.2307/2333709
Sarkadi K. Testing for normality, Banach Center Publications, 1980, Vol. 6, pp. 281–287. DOI: 10.4064/-6-1281-287
Hersgaard D. Distributions of asymmetric trimmed means, Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 1979, Vol. 8(4), pp. 359–367. DOI: 10.1080/03610917908812125
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 A. V. Shved, Ye. O. Davydenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Licensing Notifications in the Copyright Notices
The journal allows the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles.
The journal allows to reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a Creative Commons license СС BY -SA.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-SA that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.