DETERMINATION AND COMPARISON METHODS OF BODY POSITIONS ON STREAM VIDEO

Authors

  • N. V. Bilous Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • I. A. Ahekian Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • V. V. Kaluhin Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2023-2-6

Keywords:

computer vision, body position, keypoints, pose estimation, pose comparison, blazepose, mediapipe, tensorflow

Abstract

Context. One of the tasks of computer vision is the task of determining the human body in the image. There are many methods to solve this problem, some are based on specific equipment (motion capture, kinect) and provide the highest accuracy, some give less accuracy but do not require additional equipment and use less computing power. But usually, such equipment has a high cost, so to ensure the low cost of developments designed to determine the body in the image, you should develop algorithms based on computer vision technology. These algorithms can then be applied to various fields to analyze and compare body positions for a variety of purposes.

Objective. The aim of the work is to study the effectiveness of existing libraries to determine the human body position in the image, as well as methods for comparing the obtained poses in terms of speed and accuracy of determination.

Methods. A set of libraries and pose comparison algorithms were analyzed for the purpose of developing a system for determining the correctness of exercise by the user in real time. OpenPose, PoseNet and BlazePose libraries were analyzed for their suitability in recognizing and tracking body parts and movements in real-time video streams. The advantages and disadvantages of each library were evaluated based on their performance, accuracy, and computational efficiency. Additionally, different pose comparison algorithms were analyzed. The effectiveness of each algorithm was evaluated based on their ability to accurately determine and compare body positions.

As a result, the combination of BlazePose and weighted distance method can achieve the best performance in pose recognition, with high accuracy and robustness across a range of challenging scenarios. The weighted distance method can be further enhanced with techniques such as L2 normalization and pose alignment to improve its accuracy and generalization. Overall, the combination of the BlazePose library and weighted distance methods offers a powerful and effective solution for pose recognition, with high F1 index.

Results. Existing models for determining poses have shown similar results in the quality of determination with a run-up of about 2%. When developing a cross-platform software product, the BlazePose library, which has an API for working directly in the browser and on mobile platforms, has a significant advantage in speed and accuracy. Also, as the library uses extended 33 keypoint topology it becomes applicable to a wider list of tasks. In the study of comparison methods, the greatest influence on the results was exerted by the quality of pose determination.

Conclusions. Among the methods of comparison, the method of weighted distances showed the best results. The speed of position determination is inversely proportional to the quality of determination and significantly exceeds the recommended value – 40ms.

Author Biographies

N. V. Bilous, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine

PhD, Associate professor, Professor of the Software Engineering Department

I. A. Ahekian, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Senior Lecturer of the Software Engineering Department

V. V. Kaluhin, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Master of the Software Engineering Department

References

Zhipeng Z., Dong X., Shijie H. A Survey of Body Pose Estimation: Recent Advances and Future Prospects, Journal of Imaging, 2021, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 1–31. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging7030045

Shcherbakova G. Y., Krylov V. N., Bilous N. V. Methods of automated classification based on wavelet-transform for automated medical diagnostics, 2015 Information Technologies in Innovation Business Conference (ITIB). Kharkiv, Ukraine, 7–9 October 2015, [S. l.], 2015. DOI: 10.1109/itib.2015.7355048

Rakova A. O., Bilous N. V. Research on Methods for Development of Software System for Face Orientation Vector Determining in the Image, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2020, No. 3(54), pp. 121–129. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2020-3-11

Shih-En W. Convolutional Pose Machines, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016. [S. l.], 2016. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2016.511

Kendall A. PoseNet: A Convolutional Network for RealTime 6-DOF Camera Relocalization [Electronic resource] / Alex Kendall, Matthew Grimes, Roberto Cipolla // 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile, 7–13 December 2015. – [S. l.], 2015. DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2015.336

Tsung-Yi L. Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context, Computer Vision – ECCV 2014. Cham, 2014, pp. 740–755. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48

Yang Y., Ramanan D. Articulated Human Detection with Flexible Mixtures of Parts, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2013, Vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 2878–2890. DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2012.261

Cao Z. OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fields, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2019, P. 1. DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2019.2929257

Ge L. Real-Time 3D Hand Pose Estimation with 3D Convolutional Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2019, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 956–970. DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2018.2827052

Liu Y. OpenPose-Based Yoga Pose Classification Using Convolutional Neural Network, Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2022, Vol. 23, pp. 72–76. DOI: 10.54097/hset.v23i.3130

Bilous N. V., Krasov A. I., Vlasenko V. P. Deletion method of image low-frequency components using fast median filter algorithm, Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2016, pp. 7–14. DOI: 10.21272/jes

Bazarevsky V., Grishchenko I., Raveendran K. BlazePose: On-device Real-time Body Pose tracking, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, P. 4. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2006.10204

Yu L., Gao Xiao-Shan Improve Robustness and Accuracy of Deep Neural Network with L2 Normalization, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2022, pp. 1–26. DOI: 10.1007/s11424-022-1326-y

Friedhoff J. Move Mirror: An AI Experiment with Pose Estimation in the Browser using TensorFlow.js [Electronic resource]. Mode of access: https://blog.tensorflow.org/2018/07/move-mirror-aiexperiment-with-pose-estimation-tensorflow-js.html (date of access: 18.04.2023). Title from screen.

Borkar P. K., Pulinthitha M. M., Pansare A. Match Pose – A System for Comparing Poses, International journal of engineering research & technology, 2019, P. 3. DOI: 10.17577/IJERTV8IS100253

Dembczy´nski K., Waegeman W., Cheng W., H¨ullermeier E. An exact algorithm for F-measure maximization, Neural Information Processing Systems, 2011, P. 9.

Rutanen K. O-notation in algorithm analysis. Data Structures and Algorithms, 2022, P. 216. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1309.3210

Malmir B. Exploratory studies of Human Gait Changes using Depth Cameras and Sample Entropy [Electronic resource] : thesis. [S. l.], 2018. Mode of access: http://hdl.handle.net/2097/38949 (date of access: 18.04.2023). – Title from screen.

Bijelic M., Gruber T., Ritter W. A Benchmark for Lidar Sensors in Fog: Is Detection Breaking Down? 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). Changshu, 26–30 June 2018, [S. l.], 2018. DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2018.8500543

Downloads

Published

2023-06-29

How to Cite

Bilous, N. V., Ahekian, I. A., & Kaluhin, V. V. (2023). DETERMINATION AND COMPARISON METHODS OF BODY POSITIONS ON STREAM VIDEO . Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, (2), 52. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2023-2-6

Issue

Section

Neuroinformatics and intelligent systems