EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF MECHANISMS FOR FRAME BLOCKS TRANSMISSION IN NOISY CHANNELS OF IEEE 802.11 NETWORKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2025-2-1Keywords:
IEEE 802.11 wireless networks, throughput, noise intensity, BER, frame blocks, VBS and FBS mechanismsAbstract
Context. Aggregating frames into blocks when transmitting information in wireless IEEE802.11 networks helps to significantly reduce overhead costs and increase the transmission rate. However, the impact of noise reduces the efficiency of such transmission due to an increased probability of distortion of longer messages. We compared the efficiency of data transmission by variable and constant size blocks formed from frames using VBS and FBS mechanisms correspondingly under conditions of noise varying intensity.
Objective. The purpose of this article is a comparative study of VBS and FBS mechanisms used for the formation and transmission of different sizes frame blocks under medium and high noise intensity.
Method. A simple model used in IEEE 802.11 networks to determine the DSF throughput for transmitting frames in infrastructure domains was modified by us to transmit frame blocks of different sizes under conditions of medium and high intensity noise affecting the transmission process. We use for transmission a discrete in time Gaussian channel without memory. In such a channel, bit errors are independent and equally distributed over the bits of the frame. The scale factors of the model for the number of frames in a block k = 6–40 at an average noise level corresponding to BER = 10–6 and k = 4–15 for high-intensity noise at BER = 10–5 are determined. The algorithm for calculation of the network throughput has been generalized. The investigation of the dependences of the throughput on the number of frames in the VBS blocks showed the presence of local maxima in dependences, located in the region of average values of the frames number. These maxima are more pronounced at increased data transfer rates.
Results. It is shown that with a small number of frames in a block (k = 6–9) and high-intensity noise, the efficiency of the FBS mechanism exceeds the efficiency of the VBS block formation mechanism. However, at the same noise level, an increase in the
number of frames in a block (k ≥ 10) makes the use of the VBS mechanism more preferable. This advantage is explained by the fact that the VBS mechanism at each subsequent stage of transmission forms a block from frames distorted at the previous stage, therefore the size of the blocks at subsequent stages decreases, increasing the number of frames successfully transmitted to the AP (due to the increase in the probability of transmitting shorter blocks). At the same time, the constant and small probability of successful transmission of a constant size block at each stage makes the probability of transmission of frames distorted at the previous stages low. The situation changes for noise of medium intensity. Here the transmission of each subsequent block in the range of up to 25 frames per block using the VBS method requires the use of two stages. The application of the FBS method in these conditions shows that only the first set of frames requires the use of two stages for its complete transmission. Then, due to the accumulation of frames at the previous stages, each subsequent stage of transmission completes the formation of the corresponding set in the memory of AP.
Thus, when the noise intensity decreases to BER = 10–6 and below, the use of the FBS mechanism becomes more effective. The obtained results are illustrated with specific examples characterizing the formation and transmission of various frame blocks.
Conclusions. In this article, using a mathematical model modified by us, a comparative study was conducted on the efficiency of various mechanisms for forming and transmitting a frame block of different sizes under conditions of the impact of different intensity noise on the transmission process. The algorithm for calculating the network throughput was generalized, and the values of the throughput were determined when using the VBS and FBS network functioning mechanisms.
References
IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks –Media Access Control (MAC) Service Definition, IEEE 802.1AC-2016, 2016.
IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks, IEEE 802.1AX-2020, 2020.
Bloch M. R. Covert communication over noisy channels: A resolvability perspective, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2016, Vol. 62, № 5, P. 2334–2354. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2016.2530089
Wang H., Li X., Jhaveri R. H. et al. Sparse Bayesian learning based channel estimation in FBMS/OQAM industrial IoT networks, Computer Communications, 2021, Vol. 176, № 1, pp. 40–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.05.020
Hien Q. Ta., Quoc-Viet Pham, Khuong Ho-Van et al. Covert communication with noise and channel uncertainties, Wireless Networks, 2022, Vol. 28, № 1, pp. 161–172. DOI: 10.1007/s11276-021-02828-3
Aldbaibani Omar A., Raschella G. Mohi-Ud-Din, Mackay M. User Prioritisation Algorithm for Horizontal Handover in Dense WLANs, International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 2022, Vol. 29, pp. 130–142. DOI: 10.1007/s10776-021-00544-5
Gast M. 802.11 Wireless Networks: The Definitive Guide, O’ Reilly Media, Inc., 2005, 630 p.
Proakis J. G., Salehi M. Digital Communications. Fifth Edition, McGrow-Hill Education, 2007, 150 p.
Li T., Ni Q., Turletti T. et al. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11e block ACK scheme in a noisy channel, Proc. of Broadnet IEEE International Conference, Boston, Oct. 2005, Vol. 1, pp. 511–517. DOI: 10.1109/ICBN.2005.1589655
Lee H., Tinnirello I., Yu J. et al. Throughput and delay analysis of IEEE 802.11e Block ACK with channel errors, Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Communication Systems Software and Middleware, Jan. 2007, pp. 406–414. DOI: 10.1109/COMSWA.2007.382498
IEEE. IEEE standard for information technology– telecommunications and information exchange between systems – Local and metropolitan area networks – Specific requirements – Part II: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications : IEEE standard 802.11-2012. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2012. (Revision of IEEE standard 802.11-2007).
Tanenbaum A., Wetherall D. Computer Networks. New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2011, 960 p.
Kurose James F., Keith W. Computer Networking. A TopDown Approach. Kurose, Keith W. Ross New Jersey, Pearson Education Inc., 2013, 889 p.
Kim T. O., Kim J. K., Choj B. D. Performance analysis of IEEE 802.11 DCF and IEEE 802.11 EDCA in nonsaturation condition, IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2008, Vol. E91.B, № 4, pp. 1122–1131. DOI: 10.1093/ietcom/e91-b.4.1122
Zhao Q., Tsang D. H. K., Sakurai T. A Scalable and Accurate Nonsaturated IEEE 802.11e EDCA Model for an Arbitrary Buffer Size, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2013, Vol. 12, № 12, pp. 2455–2469. DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2012.211
Wei F. Performance analysis of IEEE 802.11e EDCA wireless networks under finite load, Wireless Networks, 2020, Vol. 26, № 11, pp. 4431–4457. DOI: 10.1007/s11276-020-02324-0
Cover T. M., Thomas J. A. Elements of Information Theory. Second Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey, Wiley, 2006, 774 p.
Ghani B., Launay F., Pousset Y.et al. Low-complexity hybrid interference cancellation for sparse code multiple access, J Wireless Com Network, 2022, 95 (2022). DOI: 10.1186/s13638-022-02162-y
Breed G. Bit error rate: fundamental concepts and measurement issues, High Frequency Design. Summit Technical Media LLC, January 200, pp. 46–48.
Castro P. M., González-Coma J. P., García-Naya J. A. et al. Performance of MIMO systems in measured indoor channels with transmitter noise, J Wireless Com Network, 2012, 109 (2012). DOI: 10.1186/1687-1499-2012-109
Studer C., Wenk M., Burg A. MIMO transmission with residual transmit-RF impairments, 2010 International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas (WSA). Bremen, Germany, 2010, pp. 189–196. DOI: 10.1109/WSA.2010.5456453
Tinnirello I., Choi S. Efficiency analysis of burst transmissions with block ACK in contention-based 802.11e WLANs, IEEE International Conference on Communications, Seoul, 2005, ICC 2005, Vol. 5, pp. 3455–3460. DOI: 10.1109/ICC.2005.1495062
Khandetskyi V. S., Karpenko N. V. Modeling of IEEE 802.11 computer networks at increased interference intensity, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2022, Vol. 61, № 2, pp.132–139. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2022-2-13
Tinnirello I., Bianchi G., Xiao Y. Refinements on IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function Modeling Approaches, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2010, Vol. 59, № 3, pp. 1055–1067. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2009.2029118
Bianchi G. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2000, Vol. 18, № 3, pp. 535–547. DOI: 10.1109/49.840210
Patidar R., Roy S., Henderson T.R.et al.Validation of Wi-Fi network simulation on ns-3, University of Washington Technical Report: August 7, 2017. Seattle, WA, 98195, 13 p.
Ouyang M., Shi W., Zhang R. et al. Optimal interference range for minimum Bayes risk in binomial and Poisson wireless networks, J Wireless Com Network, 2019, 247 (2019). DOI: 10.1186/s13638-019-1585-z
Shi Y., Hou T., Liu J. et al. Bridging the gap between protocol and physical models for wireless networks, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2013, 12(7), pp. 1404– 1416. DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2012.118
Bazkurt A. Optimal delay analysis for real-time traffics over IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs, EURASIP Journal of Wireless
Communications and Networking, 2016, 52 (2016). DOI: 10.1186/s13638-016-0545-0
Banchs A., Vollero L.Throughput analysis and optimal configuration of 802.11e EDCA, Computer Networks, 2006, Vol. 50, № 11, pp.1749–1768. DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2005.07.008
Chen X., Zhai H., Tian X. et al. Supporting QoS in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2006, Vol. 8, № 5, pp. 2217–2227. DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2006.1687738
Engelstad P. E., Osterbo O. N. Analysis of the Total Delay of IEEE 802.11e EDCA and 802.11 DCF, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Istanbul, Turkey, 2006, pp. 552–559. DOI: 10.1109/ICC.2006.254853
Min G., Hu J., Woodward M. E. Performance modelling and analysis of the TXOP scheme in wireless multimedia networks with heterogeneous stations, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2011, Vol. 12, № 10, pp. 4130– 4139. DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2011.093011.101387
Yan S., Cong Y., Hanly S. V. et al. Gaussian signaling for cover communications, IEEE Transactions for Cover Communications, 2019, Vol. 18, № 7, pp. 3542–3553. DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2019.2915305
Andreadis A., Risutto S., Zambon R. A cross-layer jitterbased TCP for wireless networks, Journal of Wireless Communications and Networking, 2016, 191(2016). DOI: 10.1186/s13638-016-0695-0
Khandetskyi V. S., Gerasimov V. V., Karpenko N. V. Performance analysis of wireless computer networks in conditions of high interference intensity, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2023, Vol. 66, № 3, pp. 148–159. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2023-3-15
Xiao Y., Rosdahl J. Performance analysis and enhancement for the current and future IEEE 802.11 MAC protocols, ACM SIGMOBILE. Mobile Computing and Communications Review (MC2R), special issue on Wireless Home Networks, 2003, Vol. 7, № 2, pp. 6–19. DOI: 10.1145/950391.950396
Chang Z. et al. Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11ac DCF with Hidden Nodes, 2012 IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring). Yokohama, Japan, 2012, pp. 1–5. DOI: 10.1109/VETECS.2012.6240054
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 V. S. Khandetskyi, N. V. Karpenko, V.V. Gerasimov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Licensing Notifications in the Copyright Notices
The journal allows the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles.
The journal allows to reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a Creative Commons license СС BY -SA.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-SA that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.