SITUATION ANTICIPATION AND PLANNING FRAMEWORK FOR INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENTS

Authors

  • E. V. Burov Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Y. I. Zhovnir Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • O. V Zakhariya Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • N. E. Kunanets Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2025-2-8

Keywords:

GFO, situational awareness, anticipation, situation analysis, situoid

Abstract

Context. Situation anticipation, prediction and planning play an important role in intelligent environments, allowing to learn and predict the behavior of its users, anticipate maintenance and resource provision needs. The object of study is the process of modeling the situation anticipation and planning in the situation-aware systems.
Objective. The goal of the work is to develop and analyze the ontology-based framework for modeling and predicting the situation changes for intelligent agents, allowing for proactive agent behavior.
Method. This article proposes a framework for anticipation and planning based on GFO ontology. Each task or problem is considered a situoid, having a number of intermediate situations. Each task or problem is considered a situoid, having several intermediate situations. The framework is focused on the analysis of changes between situations, coming from anticipated actions or events.
Contextually organized knowledge base of experiential knowledge is used to retrieve information about possible developments scenarios and is used for planning and evaluation. The framework allows to build and compare trajectories of configuration changes for specific objects, situations or situoids. The planning and anticipation process works in conditions of incomplete information and unpredicted external events, because the projections are constantly updated using feedback from sensor data and reconciliating this information with predicted model.
Results. The framework for reasoning and planning situations based on GFO ontology, allowing to model spatial, temporal and structural data dependencies.
Conclusions. The situation anticipation framework allows to represent, model and reason about situation dynamics in the intelligent environment, such as intelligent residential community. Prospects for further research include the elaboration of contextual knowledge storing and processing, reconciliation and learning procedures based on real-world feedback and the application of proposed framework in the real-world system, such as intelligent security systems

Author Biographies

E. V. Burov, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

Doctor of Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Information Systems and Networks

Y. I. Zhovnir, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

Postgraduate student of the Department of Information Systems and Networks

O. V Zakhariya, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

Postgraduate student of the Department of Information Systems and Networks

N. E. Kunanets, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

Doctor of Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Information Systems and Networks

References

Augusto J., Callaghan V., Cook D, Kameas A., Satoh I. Intelligent Environments: A Manifesto, Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 2013, Vol. 3, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1186/2192-1962-3-12.

Burzagli L., Pier L., Antona M, Stephanidis C. Intelligent Environments for All: A Path towards TechnologyEnhanced Human Well-Being, Universal Access in the Information Society, 2022, pp. 1–20.

Deshmukh A, Patil D, Pawar P., Kumari S., Muthulakshmi P. Recent Trends for Smart Environments With AI and IoT-Based Technologies: A Comprehensive Review, Handbook of Research on Quantum Computing for Smart Environments, 2023, pp. 435–452. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-6697-1.ch023.

Machado Pernas A., Augustin, L., Thom, L., Oliveira J. Situation-awareness as a key for proactive actions in ambient assisted living, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Angers, France, 4–7 July, 2013. Angers, 2013, Vol. 2, pp. 418–426.

Wang P., Yuan Y., Jia L., Guan X. Intelligent situation awareness based on the fractal dimension and multidimensional reconstruction, Advanced Theory and Simulations, 2024, Vol. 7, No. 4, P. 2300949. DOI: 10.1002/adts.202300949.

Blasch E. Data fusion information group (DFIG) model meets AI+ ML, Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing, Sensor: Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXXI, SPIE, 3–7 April 2022, Orlando, Florida, USA and 6–12 June 2022. Orlando, 2022, Vol. 12122, pp. 162–171. 7. Kwok K., Virdi S. Ai-based situation awareness assessment, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2022, P. 012011.

Ye F. Concepts and Conceptual Representation. Studies in No-Self Physicalism. Singapore, Springer, 2023, pp. 103–188. DOI:10.1007/978-981-19-8143-2_3.

Barrett L. How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain, Mar. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/How-EmotionsAre-Made%3A-The-Secret-Life-of-the BrainBarrett/b54f2fd56ec084aa8e1a3b05dd24d93 ecd5c94 5a

Marika C., Inhoff L., Libby A, Noguchi T, Bradley L., Ranganath C. Dynamic integration of conceptual information during learning, PLOS ONE, 2018, Vol. 13, No. 11, pp. 152–161. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0207357.

Cuper A., Cuper-Ferrigno M. A. Few Remarks on Prototype Theory in Cognitive Linguistics, Language Culture Politics International Journal, 2021, Vol. 1, pp. 57–67. DOI: 10.54515/lcp.2021.1.57-67.

Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science, Behavioral and brain sciences, 2013, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 181–204. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477.

Nadin M. Anticipation and computation: Is anticipatory computing possible?, Anticipation across disciplines, 2016, pp. 283–339. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22599-9_18.

Vieira A. Predicting online user behaviour using deep learning algorithms, arXiv, 2015. URL: https://www.preprint arXiv:1511.06247.

Martín A., Fernández-Isabel A., Martín de Diego I., Beltrán M. A survey for user behavior analysis based on machine learning techniques: current models and applications, Applied Intelligence, 2021, Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 6029–6055. DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-02160-x.

Ranjan R., Kumar S. User behaviour analysis using data analytics and machine learning to predict malicious user versus legitimate user, High-Confidence Computing, 2022, Vol. 2, No. 1, P. 100034. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcc.2021.100034.

Sarker I., Furhad M., Nowrozy R. Ai-driven cybersecurity: an overview, security intelligence modeling and research directions, SN Computer Science, 2021, Vol. 2, No. 3, P. 173. DOI: 10.1007/s42979-021-00557-0.

Saini J., Arora A., Kamboj S. Prediction of smart building and smart city resources using AI-techniques, 2nd International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON), IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.

Carneiro D., Amaral A., Carvalho M., Barreto L. An anthropocentric and enhanced predictive approach to smart city management, Smart Cities, 2021, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 1366–1390. DOI: 10.3390/smartcities4040072.

Pech M., Vrchota J., Bednář J. Predictive maintenance and intelligent sensors in smart factory, Sensors, 2021, Vol. 21, No. 4, P. 1470. DOI: 10.3390/s21041470.

Rahim A, Zhong Y., Ahmad S., Pławiak P., Hammad M. Enhancing smart home security: anomaly detection and face recognition in smart home IoT devices using logitboosted CNN models, Sensors, 2023, Vol. 23, No. 15, pp. 69–79. DOI: 10.3390/s23156979.

Kalogiannidis S., Kalfas D., Papaevangelou O., Giannarakis G., Chatzitheodoridis F. The Role of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Predictive Risk Assessment for Business Continuity: A Case Study of Greece, Risks, 2024, Vol. 12, No. 2, P. 19. DOI: 10.3390/risks12020019.

UFO community portal. – https://ontouml.org/ufo/

Herre H. General Formal Ontology (GFO): A foundational ontology for conceptual modeling, Theory and applications of ontology: computer applications. Leipzig, Springer, 2010, pp. 297–345.

Loebe F., Burek P., Herre H. GFO: The General Formal Ontology, Applied Ontology, 2022, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 71–106. DOI: 10.3233/AO-220264.

Niles I., Pease A. Towards a standard upper ontology, Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Collected Papers from the Second International Conference. New York, ACM Press, 2001, pp. 2–9.

Burek P., Loebe F., Herre H. Towards GFO 2.0: Architecture, Modules and Applications. Amsterdam, IOS Press, 2020, pp. 32–45

Degen W., Heller B., Herre H., Smith B. Gol: A General Ontological Language, Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS). New York: ACM Press, 2001, pp. 34–46.

Baumann R., Loebe F, Herre H. Towards an Ontology of Space for GFO. Amsterdam, IOS Press, 2016, pp. 53–66.

Baumann R., Loebe F., Herre H. Axiomatic Theories of the Ontology of Time in GFO, Applied Ontology, 2014, Vol. 9, No. 3–4, pp. 171–215. DOI:10.3233/AO-140136

Hoehndorf R. Situoid Theory, Proceedings of the International Conference on Ontologies and Semantic Technologies, 2005, pp. 23–34. DOI: 10.1234/ontologies.st.2005.0123..

Burov Y. Goal-driven Situation Awareness Process Based on Predictive Modeling, COLINS-2024: 8th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems, April 12–13, 2024. Lviv, 2024, pp. 157–168.

Pan S., Cambria E., Marttinen P. Pan S, Cambria E, Marttinen P, Philip S., Philip S. A survey on knowledge graphs: Representation, acquisition, and applications, IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2021, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 494–514. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843.

Gärdenfors P., Warglien M. Using conceptual spaces to model actions and events, Journal of semantics, 2012, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 487–519. DOI: 10.1093/jos/ffs007.

Artificial Intelligence Planning with STRIPS, A Gentle Introduction | Primary Objects. [Online]. Available: https://www.primaryobjects.com/2015/11/06/artificialintelligence-planning-with-strips-a-gentle-introduction/

Stringer, P., Cardoso R, Huang X, Dennis L. Adaptable and Verifiable BDI Reasoning, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, 2020, 319, pp. 117–25, DOI:doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.319.9.

Paraskevas, A. A Note on Situation Calculus, Uncertainty Discourse and Applications 1, 2024, No. 1, pp. 66–72. Received 10.10.202

Downloads

Published

2025-06-29

How to Cite

Burov, E. V., Zhovnir, Y. I. ., Zakhariya, O. V., & Kunanets, N. E. (2025). SITUATION ANTICIPATION AND PLANNING FRAMEWORK FOR INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENTS. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, (2), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2025-2-8

Issue

Section

Neuroinformatics and intelligent systems