METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOFTWARE ACCESSIBILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2025-3-15Keywords:
accessibility, inclusivity, quality subproperty, quality attribute, perceptiveness, operability, understandability, localizationAbstract
Context. The development and enhancement of methods for evaluating software accessibility is a relevant challenge in modern software engineering, as ensuring equal access to digital services is a key factor in improving their efficiency and inclusivity. The increasing digitalization of society necessitates the creation of software that complies with international accessibility standards such as ISO/IEC 25023 and WCAG. Adhering to these standards helps eliminate barriers to software use for individuals with diverse physical, sensory, and cognitive needs. Despite advancements in regulatory frameworks, existing accessibility evaluation methodologies are often generalized and fail to account for the specific needs of different user categories or the unique ways they interact with digital systems. This highlights the need for the development of new, more detailed methods for defining metrics that influence the quality of user interaction with software products.
Objective. Building a classification and mathematical model and developing accessibility assessment methods for software based on it.
Methods. A method for assessing the quality subcharacteristic “Accessibility”, which is part of the “Usability” quality characteristic, has been developed. This enabled the analysis of a website’s inclusivity for individuals with visual impairments, and the formulation of specific recommendations for further improvements, which is a crucial step toward creating an inclusive digital environment.
Results. Comparing to standardized approaches, a more detailed and practically oriented accessibility assessment methodology has been proposed. Using this methodology, an analysis of the accessibility of the main pages of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University’s website was conducted, and improvements were suggested to enhance its inclusivity.
Conclusions. This study presents the development of a classification and mathematical model, along with an accessibility assessment methodology for websites based on the ISO 25023 standard, and an analysis of the main pages of the university’s web portal. The identified quantitative accessibility indicators enable an evaluation of the web resource’s compliance with modern inclusivity requirements and provide recommendations for its improvement.
The scientific novelty of this research lies in the development of assessment methods for the “Accessibility” quality subcharacteristic by introducing new subproperties and attributes of software quality, based on clearly defined metrics specifically adapted for evaluating the accessibility level of digital products for individuals with visual impairments. This approach ensures a more precise and objective determination of web resources’ compliance with inclusivity requirements, contributing to their effectiveness and usability for this user group.
The practical significance of the obtained results lies in their applicability for objectively evaluating the accessibility of software
products and web resources.
References
Gartland S., Flynn P., Carneiro M. A., Holloway G., FialhoJ.d.S., Cullen J., Hamilton E., Harris A., Cullen C. The State of Web Accessibility for People with Cognitive Disabilities: A Rapid Evidence Assessment. Behav. Sci., 2022, 25 p. DOI: 10.3390/bs12020026.
System and software engineering. System and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE). Measurement of system and software product quality: ISO/IEC 25023:2016. [Effective from 2016-06-15]. Geneve, ISO, 2016, 54 p.
Barbosa Natã M., Hayes Jordan, Kaushik Smirity, and Wang Yang. “Every Website Is a Puzzle!”: Facilitating Access to Common Website Features for People with Visual Impairments. ACM Trans. Access. Comput., 2022, 35 p. DOI: 10.1145/3519032.
System and software engineering. System and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE). Product quality model: ISO/IEC 25010:2023. [Effective from 2023- 11-15]. Geneve, ISO, 2023, 35 p.
Systems and software engineering. Vocabulary: ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765:2017. [Effective from 2017-09-15]. Geneve, ISO, 2017, 15 p.
Nisrina Nurhuda, Eko Darwiyanto, Sri Widowati / Implementation of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Determining Priority of Software Assessment in West Java Provincial Government Based on ISO/IEC 25010 (Case Study: Sapawarga Application), Ind. Journal on Computing, 2021, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, pp. 23–40. DOI: 0.34818/indojc.2021.6.1.525.
Yarshini Thamilarasan, Raja Rina Raja Ikram, Mashanum Osman, Lizawati Salahuddin, Wan Yaakob Wan Bujeri, Kasturi Kanchymalay. Enhanced System Usability Scale using the Software Quality Standard Approach, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 2023, Vol. 13, Number 5, pp. 11779–11784. DOI: 10.48084/etasr.5971.
Pikuliak M. V., Kuz M. V., Lazarovych I. M., Kuzyk Y. M., Skliarov V. V. Method of determining the parameter of qualitative evaluation of a web forum, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2024, No. 3, pp. 151–159. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2024-3-13.
Aditia Arga Pratama, Achmad Benny Mutiara. Software Quality Analysis for Halodoc Application using ISO 25010:2011, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2021, Vol. 12, Number 8, pp. 383-392. DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120844.
Kuz M., Kozlenko M., Lazarovych I., Rysniuk O., Novak V., Novak M. Method of weights determination based on ratings of software quality metrics, Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference on Applied scientific and technical research, Ivano-Frankivsk, 1–3 April 2020: proceedings. Ivano-Frankivsk, Vol. 2, pp. 37– 39. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28381274.
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/.
Abascal J., Arrue M., Valencia X. Tools for Web Accessibility Evaluation. Springer, 2019, pp. 479–503. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_26.
ContentForest – Image Alt Checker [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://contentforest.com/tools/image-altchecker.
WCAG Color contrast checker [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/wcagcolor-contrast-check/plnahcmalebffmaghcpcmpaciebdhgdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mykola Kuz, Ivan Yaremiy, Hanna Yaremii, Mykola Pikuliak, Ihor Lazarovych, Mykola Kozlenko, Denys Vekeryk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Licensing Notifications in the Copyright Notices
The journal allows the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles.
The journal allows to reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a Creative Commons license СС BY -SA.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-SA that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
