LONG-DISTANCE CABBAGE DAMAGE AND PEST DETECTION METHOD USING YOLO11

Authors

  • K. S. Khabarlak Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
  • I. S. Laktionov Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
  • V. N. Gorev Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
  • G. G. Diachenko Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2026-1-4

Keywords:

agriculture, deep learning, plant health monitoring, pest detection, leaf damage estimation, yolo 11, brassicaceae family

Abstract

Context. To ensure sustainable yield, plant health must be constantly monitored with timely measures applied to prevent disease spread. Traditional approaches rely on manual inspection of plants, while neural networks require large amounts of annotated data to train. Both manual inspection and data annotation require expert knowledge and are time-consuming. Close-up photos of leaves are often used for training as they are easier to collect from the Internet. However, this complicates disease spread estimation at a scale. Cabbage is one of the plants widely grown in Ukraine, but existing research focusing on cabbage health monitoring is limited.
Objective. The goal of this work is to build a neural-network-based cabbage disease and pest detection system, which can be trained in on a small number of training images. At inference the system should detect pests on plant images at a distance of a whole plant.
Method. Given that existing plant disease datasets, such as IP102 and PlantDoc mostly contain close-up images of diseased plants, the networks trained on such datasets suffer from lack of generalization to images at a distance. To select the best object detection model, state-of-the-art object detection architectures, namely YOLO 8, 9, 10, 11, and RT-DETR have been analyzed in the work. To increase detection distance multi-image loss is proposed to improve hyperparameter search using Tree-Structured Parzen Estimators. Also, to improve detection quality, a novel cabbage disease dataset has been collected in Dnipro region, Ukraine. The new classes include crucifier flea beetle (widespread pest in Dnipro region) and damaged leaf. When the pest is not visible, but leaf damage is taken, determining specific pest might not be possible. Therefore, we introduce additional damaged leaf class, that captures generic plant damage. This also enables tracking of plant healing rate, when measures to stop pest spread have been taken. We combine collected images with the larger IP102 dataset to increase the number of pests covered to form new Cabbage+IP102 dataset.
Results. 1) Tree-Structured Parzen Estimators search on the multi-image loss has improved the YOLO 11 M performance from 0.3642 to 0.3892 mAP50-95 on images taken at a distance. 2) Collected dataset has enabled detection of cabbage plant health problems at a distance, including cases when the pest is currently not visible, but the damage is present.
Conclusions. In this work, the cabbage pest and damaged leaf YOLO 11 M detection system has been presented. The detector
architecture has been selected as the best-found during analysis on 2 datasets. The developed system requires only 7 annotated cabbage images to be trained and to perform pest and damaged leaf detection on high resolution images (2016x2016) of whole cabbage plants. The final model can be used to monitor cabbage health problems, damage, and rate of healing using images taken at a distance.

Author Biographies

K. S. Khabarlak, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro

PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of System Analysis and Control

I. S. Laktionov, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro

Dr. Sc., Full Professor, Professor of the Department of Computer Systems Software

V. N. Gorev, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Physics

G. G. Diachenko, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Electric Drive

References

Laktionov I. et al. A comprehensive review of recent approaches and Hardware-Software technologies for digitalisation and intellectualisation of Open-Field crop Production: Ukrainian case study in the global context, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2024, Vol. 225, P. 109326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109326.

Gong H., Ma X., Guo Y. Research on a target detection algorithm for common pests based on an improved yolov7-tiny model, Agronomy, 2024, Vol. 14, № 12. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14123068.

Teng Y. et al. MSR-RCNN: a multi-class crop pest detection network based on a multi-scale super-resolution feature enhancement module, Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, Vol. 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.810546.

Chakrabarty S. et al. Deep learning-based accurate detection of insects and damage in cruciferous crops using YOLOv5, Smart Agricultural Technology, 2024, Vol. 9, P. 100663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100663.

Dai M. et al. A new pest detection method based on improved YOLOv5M, Insects, 2023, Vol. 14, № 54. DOI: 10.3390/insects14010054.

Diachenko G. et al. An improved approach to prediction of maize disease occurrence based on weather monitoring and machine learning, Case of the forest-steppe and northern steppe of Ukraine, 2024, Vol. 12, № 4. DOI: 10.22364/BJMC.2024.12.4.03.

Bhargava A. et al. Plant leaf disease detection, classification, and diagnosis using computer vision and artificial intelligence: a review, IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2024, Vol. 12, pp. 37443–37469. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3373001.

Khabarlak K., Diachenko G., Laktionov I. Feature knowledge distillation using group convolutions for efficient plant pest recognition, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference Information Control Systems & Technologies (ICST 2024). Odesa, Ukraine, September 23–25 : CEUR workshop proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, 2024, Vol. 3790, pp. 377–387.

Girshick R.B. et al. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2014. Columbus, OH, USA, June 23–28, 2014, IEEE Computer Society, 2014, pp. 580–587. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2014.81.

Ren S. et al. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks, Advances in neural information processing systems 28: Annual conference on neural information processing systems 2015, December 7–12, 2015. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2015, pp. 91–99.

Redmon J. et al. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2016. Las Vegas, NV, USA, June 27–30, 2016, IEEE Computer Society, 2016, pp. 779–788. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.91.

Bochkovskiy A., Wang C.-Y., Liao H.-Y.M. YOLOv4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection, CoRR, 2020, Vol. abs/2004.10934.

Jocher G. Ultralytics yolov5, 2020.

Carion N. et al. End-to-end object detection with transformers, ECCV 2020, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020: Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, 2020, Vol. 12346. pp. 213–229. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13.

Wu X. et al. IP102: A large-scale benchmark dataset forinsect pest recognition, 2019 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), IEEE, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00899.

Li A. et al. D3-YOLOv10: Improved YOLOv10-based lightweight tomato detection algorithm under facility scenario, Agriculture (Nitra, Slovakia), 2024, Vol. 14, № 12. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture14122268.

Khabarlak K. S. Faster optimization-based meta-learning adaptation phase, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2022, № 1, P. 82. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2022-1-10.

Nuthalapati S. V., Tunga A. Multi-domain few-shot learning and dataset for agricultural applications, IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCVW 2021. Montreal, QC, Canada, October 11–17, 2021, IEEE, 2021, pp. 1399–1408. DOI:

1109/ICCVW54120.2021.00161.

Wang X. et al. Prior knowledge auxiliary for few-shot pest detection in the wild, Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, Vol. 13–2022. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1033544.

Jocher G., Chaurasia A., Qiu J. Ultralytics YOLOv8, 2023.

Wang C.-Y., Liao H.-Y.M. YOLOv9: Learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information, 2024.

Wang A. et al. YOLOv10: Real-time end-to-end object detection, CoRR, 2024, Vol. abs/2405.14458. DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2405.14458.

Jocher G., Qiu J. Ultralytics YOLO11, 2024.

Zhao Y. et al. DETRs beat YOLOs on real-time object detection, IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2024. Seattle, WA, USA, June 16–22, 2024, IEEE, 2024, pp. 16965–16974. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605.

Singh D. et al. PlantDoc: A dataset for visual plant disease detection, Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, pp. 249–253. DOI: 10.1145/3371158.3371196.

Cubuk E. D. et al. AutoAugment: Learning augmentation policies from data, CoRR, 2018, Vol. abs/1805.09501.

Bergstra J. et al. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization, Advances in neural information processing systems 24: 25th annual conference on neural information processing systems 2011, Proceedings of a meeting held 12–14 December 2011. Granada, Spain, 2011, pp. 2546–2554.

Akiba T. et al. Optuna: a next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework, Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

Khabarlak, K. S., Laktionov, I. S., Gorev, V. N. ., & Diachenko, G. G. (2026). LONG-DISTANCE CABBAGE DAMAGE AND PEST DETECTION METHOD USING YOLO11. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, (1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2026-1-4

Issue

Section

Mathematical and computer modelling