COMPARISON OF SOME ORTHOGONAL FUNCTION SYSTEMS FOR KOLMOGOROV-WIENER FORECASTING OF MFSD PROCESS

Authors

  • V. N. Gorev Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
  • Y. I. Shedlovska Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
  • I. S. Laktionov Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
  • G. G. Diachenko Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2026-2-1

Keywords:

Kolmogorov-Wiener filter weight function, Walsh functions, telecommunication traffic, MFSD model, Bessel functions, Galerkin method

Abstract

Context. We investigate such orthogonal function systems as the Walsh function one and the Bessel function one for the search
of the weight function of the Kolmogorov-Wiener (KW) filter for the forecasting of the heavy-tail MFSD (multifractal fractional sum-difference) random process. The results for the MAPE (mean absolute percentage error) of the misalignment of both sides of the Wiener-Hopf integral equation are compared to that obtained by the Chebyshev polynomial expansion in our previous paper.
Objective. The objective is to derive the weight function of the KW continuous filter via the truncated expansions in Walsh and Bessel functions and to compare results with the results obtained via the Chebyshev polynomials in our previous paper.
Method. Galerkin method with the Walsh functions and the Bessel functions orthogonal on the required interval as the method basis is used.
Results. It is shown that the choice of Walsh functions leads to better results for the above-described MAPE than the choice of the Chebyshev polynomials and Bessel functions. It is shown that the choice of the orthogonal polynomials is more effective than the choice of the Bessel functions. It is also obtained that of the approximation of 128 Walsh functions leads to the MAPE less than 0.5%.
Conclusions. The weight function of the KW filter in the continuous case is investigated for the forecasting of a random stationary heavy-tail process in the MFSD model. The Walsh functions and Bessel functions are chosen to be the basis of the Galerkin method described in the paper. The results are compared to that obtained with the choice of the Chebyshev polynomials. It is obtained that the Walsh functions lead to the most reliable results among the above-mentioned orthogonal function systems. The calculated results may be applied for the practical forecasting of traffic in telecommunications and also they may be applied to the treatment of random processes in other fields of knowledge: in agriculture, etc.

Author Biographies

V. N. Gorev, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Physics

Y. I. Shedlovska, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro

PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Information Technology and Computer
Engineering

I. S. Laktionov, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro

Dr. Sc, Professor, Professor of the Department of Computer Systems Software

G. G. Diachenko, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro

PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Electric Drive

References

Castellanos-Lopez S. L., Cruz-Perez F. A., Rivero-Angeles M. E. et al. Count and Teletraffic Analysis of G/M/1 Queueing Systems With Log-Normal Interarrival Time of Bursty IoT Traffic. IEEE Access, 2025, Vol. 13, pp. 50611–50634. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3543460.

Cruz-Perez F. A., Castellanos-Lopez S. L., HernandezValdez G. et al. Distribution and Moments of the Idle Period and Interarrival Time in the G/M/1 Queueing System. IEEE Access, 2025, Vol. 13, pp. 34887–34902. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3544101

Fiorini F., Cococcioni M., Pagano M. Quantitative delay analysis of GI/G/1 queues with heavy-tailed traffic by means of Alpha Theory. Computer Networks, 2025, Vol. 269, P. 111394. DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111394.

Saha S., Haque A., Sidebottom G. Overcoming data limitations in internet traffic forecasting: LSTM models with transfer learning and wavelet augmentation. Computer Communications, 2025, Vol. 242, P. 108280. DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2025.108280.

Aouedi O., Le V. A., Piamrat K. et al. Deep Learning on Network Traffic Prediction: Recent Advances, Analysis, and Future Directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 2025, Vol. 57, Issue 6, P. 151. DOI: 10.1145/3703447.

Wang L., Zhang J., Gao Y. et al. Hyperparameter Optimization for Wireless Network Traffic Prediction Models With a Novel Meta-Learning Framework. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025, Vol. 12, Issue 15, pp. 29514–29528. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2025.3568832.

Zhang Y., Wang Y., Cao H. et al. Self-similar traffic prediction for LEO satellite networks based on LSTM. IET Communications, 2025, Vol. 19, e12863. DOI: 10.1049/cmu2.12863.

Mystakidis A., Koukaras P., Tjortjis C. Advances in Traffic Congestion Prediction: An Overview of Emerging Techniques and Methods. Smart Cities, 2025, Vol. 8, No. 1, P. 25. DOI: 10.3390/smartcities8010025.

Symbor W., Falas L. Ensuring Reliable Network Communication and Data Processing in Internet of Things Systems with Prediction-Based Resource Allocation. Sensors, 2025, Vol. 25, No. 1, P. 25. DOI: 10.3390/s25010247

Wakui T., Teraoka F., Kondo T. GAMPALv2: An Anomaly Detection Mechanism for Internet Traffic by Predicting Flow Size Range from Time Features. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 2025, Vol. E108.D, Issue 6, pp. 505–516. DOI: 10.1587/transinf.2024NTP0002

Li M. Direct Generalized fractional Gaussian noise and its application to traffic modeling. Physica A, 2021, Vol. 579, P. 126138 (22 pages). DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126138

Avraham Y., Pinchas M. A Novel Clock Skew Estimator and Its Performance for the IEEE 1588v2 (PTP) Case in Fractional Gaussian Noise/Generalized Fractional Gaussian Noise Environment. Frontiers in Physics, 2021, Vol. 9, P. 796811. DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2021.796811.

Anderson D., Cleveland W. S., Xi B. Multifractal and Gaussian fractional sum-difference models for Internet traffic. Performance Evaluation, 2017, Vol. 107, pp. 1–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2016.11.001.

Gorev V., Gusev A., Korniienko V. et al. On the use of the Kolmogorov-Wiener filter for heavy-tail process prediction. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 2023, Vol. 12, № 3. pp. 315–338. DOI: 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.123.4.

Gorev V. N., Shedlovska Y. I., Laktionov I. S. et al. Method for signal processing based on Kolmogorov-Wiener prediction of MFSD process. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2024, No. 3, pp. 19–25. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2024-3-2.

Sokolovsky A. I., Sokolovsky S. A. On hydrodynamics in the presense of strong external potential field. Journal of Physics and Electronics, 2021, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 21–28. DOI: 10.15421/332103.

Sokolovsky A. I., Sokolovsky S. A., Hrinishyn O. A. On hydrodynamics in the presense of strong external potential field. East

European Journal of Physics, 2020, No. 3, pp. 19–30. DOI: 10.26565/2312-4334-2020-3-03.

Gorev V. N., Gusev A. Yu., Korniienko V. I. KolmogorovWiener filter for continuous traffic prediction in the GFSD model. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2022, No. 3, pp. 31–37. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2022-3-3.

Gorev V. N., Gusev A. Yu., Korniienko V. I. et al. Generalized fractional Gaussian noise prediction based on the Walsh functions. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2023, No. 3, pp. 48–54. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2023-3-5

Koroviaka Y., Pinka J., Tymchenko S. et al. Elaborating a scheme for mine methane capturing while developing coal gas seams. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 2020, Vol. 14, Issue 3, pp. 21–27. DOI: 10.33271/mining14.03.021

Gorev V., Gusev A., Korniienko V. Fractional Gaussian Noise Traffic Prediction Based on the Walsh Functions. CEUR Workshop proceedings, 2021, Vol. 2853, pp. 389–400.

Blackledge J. M. Digital Signal Processing. Second edition. Chichester, Horwood Publishing, 2006, 840 p.

Abramowitz M., Stegun I. A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables. Tehth edition. New York, Dover, 1972, 1046 p.

Ponce de Leon J. Revisiting the orthogonality of Bessel functions of the first kind on an infinite interval. European Journal

of Physics, 2015, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 015–016. DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/36/1/015016.

Garcia J. R. A., Garcia A. A., Castro B. C. et al. Anomalous diffusion of the center of mass during plague infestation on percolating plantations: a computational study. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2025, P. 063401. DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/add0a5

Laktionov I., Diachenko G., Koval V. et al. Computer-Oriented Model for Network Aggregation of Measurement Data in IoT Monitoring of Soil and Climatic Parameters of Agricultural Crop Production Enterprises. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 2023, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 500–522. DOI: 10.22364/bjmc.2023.11.3.09

Diachenko G., Laktionov I., Vizniuk A. et al. An Improved Approach to Prediction of Maize Disease Occurrence Based on Weather Monitoring and Machine Learning: Case of the ForestSteppe and Northern Steppe of Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 2024, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 387–414. DOI: 10.22364/bjmc.2024.12.4.03

Cheng T., Poreddy S. R., Chen K. Tail Risk in Weather Derivatives. Commodities, 2025, Vol. 4, No. 2, P. 11. DOI: 10.3390/commodities4020011.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Gorev, V. N. ., Shedlovska, Y. I., Laktionov, I. S. ., & Diachenko, G. G. (2026). COMPARISON OF SOME ORTHOGONAL FUNCTION SYSTEMS FOR KOLMOGOROV-WIENER FORECASTING OF MFSD PROCESS. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, (2), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2026-2-1

Issue

Section

Radio electronics and telecommunications